Neale Responds
Dear BKG...I wrote about this extensively during the week in The Global Conversation, and rather than start over here, I would like to simply re-publish in this space what I offered there -- which, by the way, drew more than 125 entries in the Comments section of this blogsite. (www.TheGlobalConversation.com) Here is what I wrote there... It is younger people who appear, in the main, to be the rioters and looters in the U.K. Press reports quoted Chris Sims, Chief Constable in Birmingham. Many of the young people arrested or caught on camera were "astonishingly young teenagers, girls and boys," he said, as he appealed to parents to keep their children at home Tuesday night. The saddest part of the whole scenario is that they are damaging and destroying stores and businesses in their neighborhoods -- in most cases establishments run by older adults in their own communities. And so, in what is a metaphor for all of life, their violence--while failing utterly to make the point they wish to make--is hurting themselves and those they love. The rioting was said to have started as a protest against the police (see further discussion of this below)...but the burning of buildings and the looting of stores reveals at least an expansion of that agenda, if not a complete abandonment of it. A BBC reporter spoke with some of the young people -- teenage girls standing by on the sidewalk as stores in their neighborhood burned -- and asked, "But why are you picking on shops and businesses in your own neighborhood?" A teenage girl replied, "It's the rich people. They're the ones who own the shops. We're showing the rich people that we can do what we want." The London mayor's office released a statement Tuesday which seemed to confirm that the riots spreading to many neighborhoods are "not about the black community and the police, it's about young people and the police." The statement was made by a youth worker, Shaun Bailey, and released through the mayor's office. "And let's not beat around the bush and pretend this is some type of social justice protest," Bailey said. "It's sheer criminality." Today we are moved to ask: What is it that allows human beings to justify their own involvement in such violence? What could a person possibly say to himself that could make himself feel okay about what he is doing? I believe it is a reflection of the entire Cultural Story of humanity, which says that violent protest is an appropriate way, and perhaps the only way, to "fight back" against "the system" and to protest a governance structure, an economic construction, and a societal way of life that seem to be working against, and not for, too many people. What I see when I take a look is that it is the Cultural Story of humanity that is fueling what so many people actually think, and what so many people actually do. If the young people who are now rioting in London had been taught at an early age that We Are All One, the riots could and would never have occurred. Similarly, if the government and the police and the whole general society in London and throughout the world had been acting in accordance with the precepts of humanity's Oneness, and if the systems of governance and economics had been as supportive of all people as they would be under a We Are All One scenario...the riots would never have gotten started in London or anywhere else. I don't agree with those riots as a form of protest, but I understand them. They are a visible symptom of the condition facing humanity everywhere right now. In America, a bill just passed in Washington to raise the country's debt ceiling, and to pay for it by lowering benefits to the poor and the middle class, meanwhile refusing to raise one red cent of additional revenue from the wealthy. An increase in taxes of even one-half of one percent on those who earn huge amounts of money could raise billions--but no, we need to lower Medicare benefits for the poor and Social Security payments to the elderly. How long do human beings think that such behavior can go on? Yet the solution is not violence As I said, the riots in London appear to have been instigated by the shooting death of a young man in a police action last Thursday--a turn of events that has apparently served as starter fuel for much of what has happened since. I can make no judgment on whether the police shooting was justified in any way, but I do know--as we all know--that violence can never be an antidote for violence, and that, as Albert Einstein famously said, a problem cannot be solved by utilizing the same energy that created it. Or, as my mother used to say, two "wrongs" don't make a "right," and so, even if the police are found to have acted inappropriately in the way they handed the situation in question (the incident is now being investigated), wholesale violence and looting for four days following cannot possibly be useful or helpful, and it certainly can't be healing. Saying such a thing seems to be making a statement of the obvious, yet it does bring to the fore a Larger Question: What would be useful and healing? TO BULLETIN READERS...I will offer my response to this question in this space next week. London, and the world, can be healed. But someone has to ask the Only Question No One Wants to Ask. Please return here in our next issue. It could be the most important one we've sent out in a long time. Until then...I send you love. Neale "
|
You need to be a member of CREATING A WORLD COMMUNITY to add comments!
Join CREATING A WORLD COMMUNITY